If you are a Two Sides follower, you may recall our open letter (and press release) to Google Chairman urging him and Google to re-consider their participation in the Paperless2013 initiative, and especially to consider removing or changing the negative environmental claims being made related to paper. By this we mean the reference to “saving trees” and promoting the perception that switching from paper-based to electronic communications will help protect the environment without having any verifiable or factual information to support the claims.
Challenging and correcting misleading environmental claims related to print and paper has been a focus of Two Sides in Europe for a number of years and more recently in the US after we launched our campaign in July 2012. Since then, we have approached over 50 US companies to engage with them and discuss best practices for environmental marketing related to print and paper. Although Google was not on our list, the start of Paperless 2013 in January this year required our quick response.
What followed was unexpected. Our letter received a lot of coverage, perhaps in part because it was addressed to the Chairman of Google. Others also became engaged with their views regarding Paperless2013, including PIA who also sent a letter. PrintMediaCentr was very active on social media and this had a major impact in engaging people to the point where the Twitter feed for Paperless2013 was dominated with tweets in favor of paper!
The good news is: changes have been made. There are no longer any environmental claims on the Paperless2103 site or Twitter home page and all pictures of trees or forests have been removed. The main tag line now is “Take the paper out of paperwork”, instead of “Save money. Save time. Save trees”. The screenshots before and after are shown below and in more detail here.
For this we would like to thank the Paperless 2013 coalition. It is all we were expecting and we appreciate the positive actions taken.
The “paperless” message may never go away because it is a fact that paper, in some cases, can be replaced with electronic media. Depending on the situation digital can be more practical, faster and cheaper. But it is not always more sustainable, when considering the life-cycle of both forms of communication, including their environmental and social pros and cons. The temptation of marketing departments to include environmental claims to promote digital services is often misleading and unnecessarily damaging to the print, paper and mail value chain.
The term ‘Paperless’ is also deceptive. Our own recent pilot survey of consumers reveals that more than 55% of people print some of their e-bills at home or at the office, and about 25% of people print more than 30% of their e-bills. Other research tells us that print on paper is still the medium of trust and 70% of consumers prefer to read from paper instead of from a screen. So, instead of encouraging users to ‘go paperless’, organizations should be enabling a choice of outputs – if they really want to consider their customers preferences.
Furthermore, let’s not forget that 20% of US adults and 20% of UK households do not have access to the Internet. In fact, 45% of Americans over the age of 65 don’t own a computer. Mail and paper-based communication is a vital service for this segment of the population.
Two Sides will continue its initiative to engage with companies regarding environmental claims. Our approach to date has been to engage 1-on-1 and encourage open discussion. Sometimes this works, sometimes it doesn’t. Some ignore us or don’t respond…so other tactics may be needed.
Phil Riebel
President and COO
Two Sides US, Inc.
[…] post made today by Two Sides says that Google and the Paperless2013 organizers have changed their tune. […]
[…] https://twosidesus.wordpress.com/2013/03/18/google-and-paperless2013-thank-you-for-removing-your-anti… […]
I really enjoy reading this sort of post. Google is an innovative company and cannot afford any misleading campaign regardless whether it was naive or not. Congratulations for everybody involved on this victorious battle. On an off-topic note, I´d like to know if Two Sides has any interest of spreading these initiatives to other countries like, for example, Brazil, where I do not see local Printing Industry taking measures to provide any inquiries for industries that still advertise “Save Trees, Don´t Print”.
Thank you for the comments. Yes Two Sides is an International organization and we currently operate in over 12 countries. I believe we are in discussions with both the printing and paper industries in Brazil. My colleague Martyn Eustace in the UK is leading these efforts.
Very good to know it. Do you consider opening an office or something in Brazil ??
Hi Alexandre,
I will put you in touch with Martyn who can answer this question for you.
Congrats on the impact of your efforts!
Way to go Two Sides!!! Keep up the good work…
[…] Two Sides US, an initiative focused on the responsible production and use of paper, has been hard at work to dispel rumors and myths regarding environmental impacts of paper. Self-interested groups such as Google have joined the Paperless 2013 initiative which, in recent years, has contributed to negative–and often misguided–environmental claims regarding paper use. These efforts include plugging Paperless 2013′s main tagline: “Save trees.” As we at Paper Chase have previously reported, however, these claims are overtly misleading and ignore the fact that e-media, too, has environmental impacts. Additionally, the Two Sides initiative, which is bolstered by companies in the Graphic Communications Value Chain including forestry, pulp, paper, inks and chemicals, pre press, press, finishing, publishing and printing, reminds us that “20% of US adults and 20% of UK households do not have access to the Internet. In fact, 45% of Americans over the age of 65 don’t own a computer.” Two Sides maintains that these Paperless supporters should actually enable a choice of outputs in order to truly consider their customers’ preferences. The Two Sides US initiative has been successful in garnering support via social media, and has even achieved its goal of reaching out to Google and the Paperless 2013 coalition (via an open letter), both groups removed misleading environmental claims from their websites and even altered the Paperless 2013 tagline. More information can be found here. […]
[…] For this we would like to thank the Paperless 2013 coalition. It is all we were expecting and we appreciate the positive actions taken. Read more… […]